Giacalone v. Lucas

Giacalone v. Lucas, Sheriff

Giacalone v. Lucas, 405 U.S. 922 (1972)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: February 22, 1972
Docket: No. 71-835
Citations: 405 U.S. 92230 L. Ed. 2d 793

Cited by 69 3 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(denying habeas petition based on conclusion that trial court’s denial of continuance based on medically related absence of attorney was in accordance with due process)

Slappy v. Morris, 649 F.2d 718 (9th Cir. 1981)
(defendant has no right to be present at in camera conference on evidentiary matters when his lawyer was present at the conference)

United States v. Vasquez, 732 F.2d 846 (11th Cir. 1984)
(Rule 60(b) motion subject to abuse of discretion review standard)

White v. Gen. Motors Corp., 908 F.2d 675 (10th Cir. 1990)

Cited by 69 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr., and Gwen G. Caranchini v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.908 F.2d 675 (10th Cir. 1990)
State v. Earnhardt296 S.E.2d 649 (N.C. 1982)
United States v. Brown571 F.2d 980 (6th Cir. 1978)
United States v. Bertoli854 F. Supp. 975 (D.N.J. 1994)
United States v. David Lee Brown, United States of America v571 F.2d 980 (6th Cir. 1978)
Cox v. Rose386 F. Supp. 533 (E.D. Tenn. 1975)

Most recent

State v. Tennors923 So. 2d 823 (La. Ct. App. 2006)
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Deangelo TennorsNo. KA-0005-0538 (La. Ct. App. Feb. 15, 2006)
Scott v. State1995 OK CR 14, 891 P.2d 1283
United States v. Bertoli854 F. Supp. 975 (D.N.J. 1994)
State v. Hamilton636 A.2d 760 (Conn. 1994) · Concurrence
Bernadou v. Purnell836 F. Supp. 319 (D. Maryland 1993)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list