Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
Schneckloth, Conservation Center Superintendent v. Bustamonte
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 405 U.S. 1062 (1972)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 953.] Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Stuart P. Tobisman, Esquire, of Los Angeles, California, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for respondent pro hac vice in this case.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.