Martin v. City of New Orleans
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Appeal from Sup. Ct. La. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Gooding v. Wilson, 405 U. S. 518 (1972). See Lewis v. City of New Orleans, 408 U. S. 913 (1972). The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Blackmun, and Mr. Justice Rehnquist dissent for the reasons expressed in the several opinions in Rosenfeld v. New Jersey, 408 U. S. 901 (1972); Lewis v. City of New Orleans, supra; and Brown v. Oklahoma, 408 U. S. 914 (1972). Mr. Justice Powell would remand cause for further consideration only in light of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U. S. 568 (1942). See concurring opinion in Lewis v. City of New Orleans, supra.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.