Basyap, Inc. v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency

Basyap, Inc. v. Dist. of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency, 409 U.S. 1008 (1972)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: November 13, 1972
Docket: No. 72-381
Citations: 409 U.S. 100893 S. Ct. 44234 L. Ed. 2d 3011972 U.S. LEXIS 654

Cited by 50 5 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(reasonable for police to look through window while standing at front door trying to locate and interview defendant)

United States v. Daoust, 916 F.2d 757 (1st Cir. 1990)
(newspaper dealers who control their own distribution and who bear almost all of the risk of loss are independent contractors)

Chase v. The Trs. of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund, Donald R, 753 F.2d 744 (9th Cir. 1985)
(police have no right to look through window simply to see if drug activity is taking place inside)

Miller v. State, 13 S.W.3d 588 (Ark. Ct. App. 2000)
(no search to peer into window alongside front door)

United States v. Head, 783 F.2d 1422 (9th Cir. 1986)

Cited by 50 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Local 777, Democratic Union Organizing Committee, Seafarers International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Yellow Cab Company and Checker Taxi Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Local 777, Democratic Union, Etc.603 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
Local 777, Democratic Union Organizing Committee v. National Labor Relations Board603 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
United States v. Michael Patrick Wheeler641 F.2d 1321 (9th Cir. 1981)
Faber v. Althoff812 P.2d 1031 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990)
Yoder v. T.E.L. Leasing, Inc. (In re Suburban Motor Freight, Inc.)114 B.R. 943 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1990)
Roth Steel Products, and Toledo Steel Tube Company v. Sharon Steel Corporation705 F.2d 134 (6th Cir. 1983)

Most recent

State v. Lane922 A.2d 828 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2007)
Scott v. State782 A.2d 862 (Md. 2001)
United States v. Hogan122 F. Supp. 2d 358 (E.D.N.Y. 2000)
State v. Poling531 S.E.2d 678 (W. Va. 2000)
Miller v. State13 S.W.3d 588 (Ark. Ct. App. 2000)
No. 95-196190 F.3d 903 (4th Cir. 1996)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list