Chagois v. Lykes Bros. Steamship

Chagois v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc.

Chagois v. Lykes Bros. S.S., 409 U.S. 1012 (1972)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: November 13, 1972
Docket: No. 72-5296
Judges: Certiorari
Citations: 409 U.S. 101293 S. Ct. 45134 L. Ed. 2d 3061972 U.S. LEXIS 697

Cited by 36 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(§ 6901 assessment not required to maintain action under § 6324, as provisions were “cumulative and alternative — not exclusive or mandatory”)

United States v. Perrina, 877 F. Supp. 215 (D.N.J. 1994)
(radio and newspaper advertising “expensive and relatively ineffectual”)

Husky Oil v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 669 F.2d 643 (10th Cir. 1982)

Cited by 36 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Karr v. City of Beaumont, Tex.950 F. Supp. 1317 (E.D. Tex. 1997)
Husky Oil, N.P.R. Operations, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board669 F.2d 643 (10th Cir. 1982)
Ted L. Lindow v. United States738 F.2d 1057 (9th Cir. 1984)
United States Department of Labor v. Cole Enterprises, Inc., and William C. Cole62 F.3d 775 (6th Cir. 1995)
United States v. Wander601 F.2d 1251 (3d Cir. 1979)
Fegley v. Higgins19 F.3d 1126 (6th Cir. 1994)

Most recent

Dominguez v. Quigley's Irish Pub, Inc.790 F. Supp. 2d 803 (N.D. Ill. 2011)
Desmond v. PNGI Charles Town Gaming, LLC661 F. Supp. 2d 573 (N.D.W. Va. 2009)
Chao v. Tyson Foods, Inc.568 F. Supp. 2d 1300 (N.D. Ala. 2008)
United States v. Estate of Davenport159 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (N.D. Okla. 2001)
Karr v. City of Beaumont, Tex.950 F. Supp. 1317 (E.D. Tex. 1997)
Adams v. Bowsher946 F. Supp. 37 (D.D.C. 1996)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list