Enders v. Esquire Theaters of America, Inc.

Enders, District Attorney of Oneida County, New York v. Esquire Theaters of America, Inc.

Enders v. Esquire Theaters of Am., Inc., 409 U.S. 1100 (1973)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: January 8, 1973
Docket: No. A-557
Citations: 409 U.S. 110093 S. Ct. 88834 L. Ed. 2d 6821973 U.S. LEXIS 3745

Cited by 39 5 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

D. C. N. D. N. Y. Application for stay of execution of judgment in case No. 72-CV-450 presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending disposition of case in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(holding that a change in the state parole authority’s interpretation of the relevant eligibility provisions was within the reach of the clause because “[a]bsent a court pronouncement on the matter” the agency interpretation had “the force and effect of law”)

Rodriguez v. United States Parole Comm'n & Metro. Corr. Ctr., Robert Elsea, 594 F.2d 170 (7th Cir. 1979)
(but cited in Warden v. Marrerro, 417 U.S. 653, 663, 94 S.Ct. 2532, 41 L.Ed.2d 383 (1974))

Ogg v. Klein, 572 F.2d 1379 (9th Cir. 1978)
(a state parole authority’s change in the interpretation of a parole eligibility provision is subject to ex post facto constraints because the agency’s interpretation had the effect of law)

C.T. Akins, Jay M. Fate, Michael Schroeder v. Snow, 922 F.2d 1558 (11th Cir. 1991)
(change in administrative interpretation of parole statute)

Geraghty v. United States Parole Comm'n, 579 F.2d 238 (3d Cir. 1978)

Cited by 39 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Hamm v. Latessa, MCI72 F.3d 947 (1st Cir. 1995)
Morrison v. State845 S.W.2d 882 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)
Andrew G. Holguin, Jr. v. Robert R. Raines695 F.2d 372 (9th Cir. 1982)
United States v. Stuart Jeffrey Paskow11 F.3d 873 (9th Cir. 1993)
John J. Rodriguez v. United States Parole Commission and Metropolitan Correctional Center, Robert Elsea, Warden594 F.2d 170 (7th Cir. 1979)
Richard Charles Ruip v. United States555 F.2d 1331 (6th Cir. 1977)

Most recent

Ashkenazi v. Attorney General of the United States246 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2003)
D'Joy v. New York State Division of Parole127 F. Supp. 2d 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)
Hamm v. Latessa, MCI72 F.3d 947 (1st Cir. 1995)
United States v. Stuart Jeffrey Paskow11 F.3d 873 (9th Cir. 1993)
Morrison v. State845 S.W.2d 882 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)
Payton v. State830 S.W.2d 722 (Tex. App. 1992)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list