TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. United States

R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. United States, 410 U.S. 964 (1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 5, 1973
Docket
No. 71-157
Citations
410 U.S. 96493 S. Ct. 143435 L. Ed. 2d 7061973 U.S. LEXIS 3926

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

D. C. N. J. Motion to grant certiorari and consolidate for oral argument with No. 71-1647, Federal Maritime Commission v. Seatrain Lines, Inc. [certiorari granted, 409 U. S. 1058 ], denied. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 160 cases

View all citing references →
1973: 51974: 171975: 161976: 211977: 111978: 21979: 101980: 81981: 81982: 81983: 61984: 41985: 51986: 41987: 31988: 31989: 21990: 21991: 51992: 41993: 11994: 11995: 51996: 32000: 12003: 32009: 12011: 119732026peak 1976 · 21

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.416 F. Supp. 316 (D.N.J. 1976)
  2. United States v. Haldeman559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  3. Turchick v. United States561 F.2d 719 (8th Cir. 1977)
  4. United States v. Harry R559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  5. Mittelstaedt v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF UNIVER. OF ARK.487 F. Supp. 960 (E.D. Ark. 1980)
  6. United States v. Barnes604 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1979)

Most recent

  1. United States v. McKenzie779 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (D.N.M. 2011)
  2. In re Application of Madison687 F. Supp. 2d 103 (E.D.N.Y. 2009)
  3. Depew v. Sullivan2003 UT App 152, 71 P.3d 601
  4. Blaylock, Melvin v. StateNo. 08-01-00464-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Feb. 20, 2003)
  5. Commonwealth v. Sullivan61 Pa. D. & C.4th 280 (2003)
  6. Doret v. United States765 A.2d 47 (D.C. 2000)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list