Grossman v. Kavanagh
Grossman v. Kavanagh, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Michigan
Grossman v. Kavanagh, 411 U.S. 914 (1973)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(explaining that the inherent power of the court is “the source of power to do things necessary to perform the judicial function for which the legislative branch has not provided, and, in rare instances, to act contrary to the dictates of the legislative branch”)
-
(“reparations” for delayed payment of federal public assistance benefits involved “substantial expenditures from public funds of the state” thereby requiring Eleventh Amendment protections)
-
(requirement of a filing fee, when applied to indigents seeking to appeal an adverse welfare decision, does not violate due process)
Cited by 72 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals30
- Federal District Courts27
- Bankruptcy Courts1
- State Highest Courts7
- State Appellate Courts7
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.