Mahan v. Howell
Mahan, Secretary, State Board of Elections v. Howell and City of Virginia Beach v. Howell
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
410 U. S. 315 . Treating the petition for rehearing in No. 71-373 as a motion to modify the Court’s opinion, the following order is hereby entered:
“The motion of appellant, city of Virginia Beach, to modify this Court’s opinion is hereby granted. The first paragraph in Part II of the opinion is amended by adding ‘a portion of’ after the phrase ‘Under the plan,’ in the second sentence thereof, and by striking the phrase ‘encompassing the cities of Norfolk and Virginia Beach’ in the last sentence of the paragraph, substituting therefor the following phrase: ‘encompassing the city of Norfolk and a portion of Virginia Beach.’
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 23 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals7
- Federal District Courts4
- State Highest Courts8
- State Appellate Courts3
- Territorial Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Navajo Nation v. San Juan County
- League of United Latin American Citizens, Council No. 4434 v. Clements
- Franklin Tp. v. BD. OF ED. N. HUNTERDON REG. HIGH SCH.
- Borough of Oceanport v. Hughes
- League of United Latin American Citizens, Council No. 4434, and Jessie Oliver, Intervening v. William P
- Township of Franklin v. Board of Education
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.