Thompson v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.
Thompson v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. and United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. Thompson
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Appeals from D. C. W. D. Ark. *904 Judgment vacated and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.
Mr. Justice Douglas would affirm the judgment in No. 70-23. He would reverse the judgment in No. 70-30. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 37. Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would vacate the judgment and remand cases for further consideration in light of Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U. S. 225 (1972).
Reported below: 316 F. Supp. 815 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.