Austin v. Meyer
Austin v. Meyer Byrne, District Attorney of Suffolk County v. P. B. I. C., Inc. Davis v. Parker
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
*905 Appeal from D. C. M. D. Fla. Reported below: 319 F. Supp. 457 ;
*906 No. 71-1318.
Appeal from D. C. Mass. Reported below: 313 F. Supp. 757 ; and
Appeal from D. C. C. D. Cal. Judgments vacated and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, ante, p. 15; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 49; Kaplan v. California, ante, p. 115; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels Film, ante, p. 123; United States v. Orito, ante, p. 139; Heller v. New York, ante, p. 483; Roaden v. Kentucky, ante, p. 496; and Alexander v. Virginia, ante, p. 836.
Mr. Justice Douglas would affirm the judgments. Mr. Justice Brennan, joined by Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall, would vacate the judgments and remand the cases for further proceedings not inconsistent with his dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, ante, p. 73. See Miller v. California, ante, p. 47.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(vacated for further consideration in light of subsequent case law)
Cited by 22 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court5
- U.S. Courts of Appeals5
- Federal District Courts2
- State Highest Courts8
- State Appellate Courts1
- State Trial Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.