Hoover, Inc. v. Commissioner
Hoover, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Hoover, Inc. v. Comm'r, 414 U.S. 826 (1973)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(City may annex Air Force base to the extent permitted by Congress)
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- United States v. James H. McGee
- Hansford v. District of Columbia
- Black Hills Power & Light Co. v. Weinberger
- Black Hills Power and Light Company, a South Dakota Corporation v. Caspar W. Weinberger, as Secretary of the Department of Defense Department of Defense, an Agency of the United States of America Richard D. Rasmussen, as Contracting Officer for Ellsworth Air Force Base, a Defense Installation Under the Control of the Department of Defense Heartland Consumers Power District, a Subdivision of the State of South Dakota West River Electric Association, Inc., a South Dakota Rural Electric Cooperative and the Public Utilities Commission, a Regulatory Commission of the State of South Dakota, Black Hills Power and Light Company v. Heartland Consumers Power District, Ellsworth Air Force Base, United States of America, (Two Cases) Black Hills Power and Light Company, a South Dakota Corporation v. Caspar W. Weinberger, as Secretary of the Department of Defense Department of Defense, an Agency of the United States of America Richard D. Rasmussen, as Contracting Officer for Ellsworth Air Force Base, a Defense Installation Under the Control of the Department of Defense Heartland Consumers Power District, a Subdivision of the State of South Dakota West River Electric Association, Inc., a South Dakota Rural Electric Cooperative and the Public Utilities Commission, a Regulatory Commission of the State of South Dakota, Black Hills Power and Light Company v. Heartland Consumers Power District, Ellsworth Air Force Base, United States of America. (Two Cases)
- In re the Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4
Most recent
- Hansford v. District of Columbia
- Black Hills Power and Light Company, a South Dakota Corporation v. Caspar W. Weinberger, as Secretary of the Department of Defense Department of Defense, an Agency of the United States of America Richard D. Rasmussen, as Contracting Officer for Ellsworth Air Force Base, a Defense Installation Under the Control of the Department of Defense Heartland Consumers Power District, a Subdivision of the State of South Dakota West River Electric Association, Inc., a South Dakota Rural Electric Cooperative and the Public Utilities Commission, a Regulatory Commission of the State of South Dakota, Black Hills Power and Light Company v. Heartland Consumers Power District, Ellsworth Air Force Base, United States of America, (Two Cases) Black Hills Power and Light Company, a South Dakota Corporation v. Caspar W. Weinberger, as Secretary of the Department of Defense Department of Defense, an Agency of the United States of America Richard D. Rasmussen, as Contracting Officer for Ellsworth Air Force Base, a Defense Installation Under the Control of the Department of Defense Heartland Consumers Power District, a Subdivision of the State of South Dakota West River Electric Association, Inc., a South Dakota Rural Electric Cooperative and the Public Utilities Commission, a Regulatory Commission of the State of South Dakota, Black Hills Power and Light Company v. Heartland Consumers Power District, Ellsworth Air Force Base, United States of America. (Two Cases)
- Black Hills Power & Light Co. v. Weinberger
- United States v. James H. McGee
- In re the Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.