Brigham v. United States

Brigham v. United States, 414 U.S. 831 (1973)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 9, 1973
Docket: No. 72-1693
Citations: 414 U.S. 83194 S. Ct. 6238 L. Ed. 2d 651973 U.S. LEXIS 200

Cited by 61 4 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(Attorney General’s failure to reclassify marijuana did not violate defendant’s equal protection or due process rights)

United States v. Fogarty, 692 F.2d 542 (8th Cir. 1982)
(“The appellants’ use of components shipped in interstate commerce to make vitamin K for injection brought their activities within § 331(k)....”)

Baker v. United States, 932 F.2d 813 (9th Cir. 1991)
(Court determines scope of settlement agreement based upon common sense understanding of intention of parties)

Filtrator Apparatus Co. v. Food Enters., 491 F. Supp. 566 (D.N.J. 1980)
(drugs not manufactured in conformity with GMPs are adulterated; United States v. Western Serum Co., Inc., 498 F.Supp. 863, 867 (D.Ariz.1980), aff'd, 666 F.2d 335 (9th Cir.1982) (“[t]he Act is concerned with the manner in which a drug is produced as well as its composition and content”)

United States v. 789 Cases, More or Less, 799 F. Supp. 1275 (D.P.R. 1992)

Cited by 61 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Seeley v. State940 P.2d 604 (Wash. 1997)
United States v. Gregory Richard Fogarty692 F.2d 542 (8th Cir. 1982)
State v. Vail274 N.W.2d 127 (Minn. 1979)
Arthur L. Stair and Bernice Stair v. United States516 F.2d 560 (2d Cir. 1975)
State v. Padua869 A.2d 192 (Conn. 2005)
United States v. Winfield L. Roberts570 F.2d 999 (D.C. Cir. 1977)

Most recent

Rodriguez, Richard VeraNo. WR-38,816-06 (Tex. App. Mar. 30, 2015)
State v. Padua869 A.2d 192 (Conn. 2005)
Grossman v. United States57 Fed. Cl. 319 (Fed. Cl. 2003)
United States v. Vidal-Cruz67 F. Supp. 2d 35 (D.P.R. 1999)
Stelco Holding Co. v. United States42 Fed. Cl. 101 (Fed. Cl. 1998)
Seeley v. State940 P.2d 604 (Wash. 1997)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list