Albert v. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc.
Albert v. Chem. Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., 414 U.S. 858 (1973)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“Trademark protection guards the public from being deceived into purchasing an infringing unwanted product”)
-
("Ownership of all of the outstanding stock of a corporation ... is not the equivalent of ownership of the subsidiary's property or assets”)
-
(prior settlement agreement recognizing a trademark’s validity estopped challenge thereof)
-
(estoppel doctrine does apply to trademark licensees)
Cited by 75 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals22
- Federal District Courts29
- Bankruptcy Courts11
- Federal Specialty Courts2
- State Highest Courts9
- State Appellate Courts1
- State Attorney General Opinions1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.