Old Dominion Box Co. v. United States

Old Dominion Box Co., Inc. v. United States

Old Dominion Box Co. v. United States, 414 U.S. 910 (1973)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 15, 1973
Docket: No. 73-133
Citations: 414 U.S. 91094 S. Ct. 23138 L. Ed. 2d 1481973 U.S. LEXIS 994

Cited by 203 11 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 11 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(adopting the principles of Rule 10b-5 in determining whether section 14(e) had been violated)

S-G Sec., Inc. v. Fuqua Inv. Co., 466 F. Supp. 1114 (D. Mass. 1979)
("These impracticalities are avoided by establishing a presumption of reliance where it is logical to presume that such reliance in fact existed ")

Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co., 646 F.2d 271 (7th Cir. 1981)
(dismissal of indictment proper if government needlessly relied on hearsay as exercise of court's supervisory power)

United States v. Cathey, 591 F.2d 268 (5th Cir. 1979)
(in absence of some showing that integrity of grand jury • proceedings has been compromised indictment will not be overturned on appeal)

United States v. Rodriguez-Ramos, 704 F.2d 17 (1st Cir. 1983)
(mandamus should not be utilized to direct or influence the exercise of discretion of a governmental official)

Willis-Gomez v. Meissner, 879 F. Supp. 1120 (W.D. Okla. 1995)
(“a prerequisite to the remedy of restitution is that a party seeking rescission must return any proceeds he has received from the transaction in order to be placed in status quo ante.”)

Prudential-Bache Sec., Inc. v. Cullather, 678 F. Supp. 601 (E.D. Va. 1987)
(analogizing it to the "materiality" standard under Sec. 10(b))

Plaine v. Mccabe, 797 F.2d 713 (9th Cir. 1986)
(claims under § 14(e) of the 1934 Act)

In re Crazy Eddie Sec. Litig., 817 F. Supp. 306 (E.D.N.Y. 1993)

Cited by 203 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Applied Digital Data Systems Inc. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.425 F. Supp. 1145 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)
Spielman v. General Host Corporation402 F. Supp. 190 (S.D.N.Y. 1975)
Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co.646 F.2d 271 (7th Cir. 1981)
United States v. Edward Baldarrama, Matias G566 F.2d 560 (5th Cir. 1978)
Berman v. Gerber Products Co.454 F. Supp. 1310 (W.D. Mich. 1978)
Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp.89 F.R.D. 87 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)

Most recent

Todd Enright v. Asclepius Panacea, LLC Asclepius Panacea GP, LLC Daily Pharmacy, LLC Daily Pharmacy GP, LLC And Toth Enterprises II, P .A. D/B/A Victory Medical CenterNo. 03-15-00348-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 24, 2015)
Sharette v. Credit Suisse International127 F. Supp. 3d 60 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Solutions Monthly Income Fund, LP28 F. Supp. 3d 887 (D. Minnesota 2014)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Teo746 F.3d 90 (3d Cir. 2014)
In re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA Lit.235 F. Supp. 2d 549 (S.D. Tex. 2002)
Salsitz v. Peltz227 F. Supp. 2d 222 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list