Russell v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.

Russell v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago

Russell v. Cont'l Ill. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 414 U.S. 1040 (1973)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: November 19, 1973
Docket: No. 73-424
Citations: 414 U.S. 104094 S. Ct. 54138 L. Ed. 2d 3311973 U.S. LEXIS 1490

Cited by 24 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(Participant in mutual fund established by a bank was not part of class of persons protected by Section 24)

Golar v. Daniels & Bell, Inc., 533 F. Supp. 1021 (S.D.N.Y. 1982)

Cited by 24 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Sylvester Marx v. Centran Corporation747 F.2d 1536 (6th Cir. 1984)
Lester Jackson v. The Washington Monthly Co.569 F.2d 119 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
Robert C. Aparicio v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company84 F.3d 803 (6th Cir. 1996)
Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak Company616 F.2d 1315 (5th Cir. 1980)
Louis W. Parker -Cross v. Motorola, Inc. -Cross524 F.2d 518 (5th Cir. 1975)
New York Stock Exchange, Inc. And Investment Company Institute v. Robert Bloom, Acting Comptroller of the Currency562 F.2d 736 (D.C. Cir. 1977)

Most recent

Cohen v. Citibank, N.A.954 F. Supp. 621 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
Robert C. Aparicio v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company84 F.3d 803 (6th Cir. 1996)
Scott v. Dime Sav. Bank of New York, FSB886 F. Supp. 1073 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)
Sargent v. Central National Bank & Trust Co. of Enid1991 OK 23, 809 P.2d 1298
Galt v. State Dept. of Fish, Wildlife731 P.2d 912 (Mont. 1987) · Dissent
Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.641 F. Supp. 828 (D. Mass. 1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list