Kovats v. First National Bank of Broken Arrow
Kovats v. First Nat'l Bank of Broken Arrow, 414 U.S. 1067 (1973)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(union violated Section 101(a)(1) by-calling for new votes after members defeated the motion because union refused to implement the negative vote of the union members)
-
(reaffirming the rule of the Johnson case)
Cited by 56 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals30
- Federal District Courts18
- Federal Specialty Courts4
- State Highest Courts3
- State Appellate Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
- American Postal Workers Union, Headquarters Local 6885 v. American Postal Workers Union
- Messerschmidt v. United States
- Pennwalt Corporation v. Durand-Wayland, Inc.
- Bunz v. Moving Picture Machine Operators' Protective Union Local 224
- Stelling v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1547
- John Stelling, Forrest Darby, Robert McDaniel and Terry C. Hix v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union Number 1547, and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, I. M. Waldrop, Jr., W. L. Vinson, Charles H. Pillard, and Wesley I. Taylor, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio (i.b.e.w.) Third Party v. Alaska Chapters, National Electrical Contractors Association, Third Party
Most recent
- State v. Hoyle
- Cannon v. South Carolina Department of Probation Parole & Pardon Services
- At & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
- International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Steamship Clerks Local 1624 v. Virginia International Terminals, Inc.
- Boyce v. Potter
- Messerschmidt v. United States
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.