TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wurzinger v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Wurzinger v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Wurzinger v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 414 U.S. 1070 (1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
December 3, 1973
Docket
No. 73-5390
Citations
414 U.S. 107094 S. Ct. 58238 L. Ed. 2d 4761973 U.S. LEXIS 1640

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 47 cases

View all citing references →
1974: 21975: 21976: 81977: 81978: 51979: 21980: 31981: 21982: 21983: 41984: 11985: 41987: 21989: 12017: 119742026peak 1976 · 8

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Daniel McCabe720 F.2d 951 (7th Cir. 1983)
  2. United States v. John Doe627 F.2d 181 (9th Cir. 1980)
  3. United States v. Richard Albert Jenkins496 F.2d 57 (2d Cir. 1974)
  4. United States v. Jerry Whaley830 F.2d 1469 (7th Cir. 1987)
  5. United States v. Cravero545 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1976)
  6. United States v. Chan Walker Zielie, Keith H. Gustafson, Thomas David Wilkerson, Robert Walter Govern, and Leon D. Mausser734 F.2d 1447 (11th Cir. 1984)

Most recent

  1. STEVEN KADONSKY VS. STEVE C. LEE (Division of Consumer Affairs)No. A-3324-14T4 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Oct. 31, 2017)
  2. Frederick Kirkpatrick v. Robert H. Butler, Sr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and the Attorney General of the State of Louisiana870 F.2d 276 (5th Cir. 1989)
  3. United States v. Jerry Whaley830 F.2d 1469 (7th Cir. 1987)
  4. Bobby James King v. State521 So. 2d 1042 (Ala. Crim. App. 1987)
  5. United States v. Richard A. Rosen, Robert Esson Rew and David Benton Holmes764 F.2d 763 (11th Cir. 1985)
  6. State v. EDDIE A.700 P.2d 751 (Wash. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list