TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of the United States & Canada, Local 540 v. Lusk

United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of the United States & Canada, Local 540 v. Lusk

United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Indus. of the United States & Canada, Local 540 v. Lusk, 415 U.S. 913 (1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
February 19, 1974
Docket
No. 73-613
Citations
415 U.S. 91394 S. Ct. 140839 L. Ed. 2d 46785 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 24651974 U.S. LEXIS 4083
Cited by 15 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →
1975: 11976: 11977: 21978: 21979: 11980: 11981: 11985: 11986: 11987: 21988: 11992: 119752026peak 1977 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hatley v. Stafford588 P.2d 603 (Or. 1978)
  2. United States v. Edward Dunn594 F.2d 1367 (10th Cir. 1979)
  3. United States v. Victoria Vamos797 F.2d 1146 (2d Cir. 1986)
  4. Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.696 P.2d 1096 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
  5. United States v. Francis E. Gillings and Ruth Gillings568 F.2d 1307 (9th Cir. 1978)
  6. United States v. Richard L. Clark617 F.2d 180 (9th Cir. 1980)

Most recent

  1. Leitz v. Thorson833 P.2d 343 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
  2. Quartararo v. Fogg679 F. Supp. 212 (E.D.N.Y. 1988)
  3. United States v. Rex S. Taylor828 F.2d 630 (10th Cir. 1987)
  4. United States v. Mary Hutson821 F.2d 1015 (5th Cir. 1987)
  5. United States v. Victoria Vamos797 F.2d 1146 (2d Cir. 1986)
  6. Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.696 P.2d 1096 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list