TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Guggenheim v. Peto

Guggenheim, Director, Department of Liquor Control v. Peto, dba Loop Carry Out

Guggenheim v. Peto, 415 U.S. 943 (1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
February 25, 1974
Docket
No. 73-987
Judges
Jurisdiction, Set, White, Would
Citations
415 U.S. 94394 S. Ct. 1462

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Affirmed on appeal from D. C. S. D. Ohio.

Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Rehnquist would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1978: 11980: 119782026peak 1978 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Barmat v. Robertson611 P.2d 101 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980)
  2. Blatnik Co. v. Ketola587 F.2d 379 (8th Cir. 1978)

Most recent

  1. Barmat v. Robertson611 P.2d 101 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980)
  2. Blatnik Co. v. Ketola587 F.2d 379 (8th Cir. 1978)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list