Bevan v. Trustees of Penn Central Transportation Co.
Bevan v. Trustees of Penn Central Transportation Co. Greenough v. Trustees of Penn Central Transportation Co. and Twenty-one Retired Employees v. Trustees of Penn Central Transportation Co.
Bevan v. Trs. of Penn Cent. Transp. Co., 415 U.S. 951 (1974)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Reported below: 484 F. 2d 1300 .
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 8 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(upholding FTC authority to promulgate substantive rules under § 6(g) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 46(g) (1976))
-
(defendant’s lawyer entitled to suggest to witness and witness’s counsel that witness might want to exercise Fifth Amendment privilege)
-
(subsequent grant of congressional authority does not prove agency’s prior lack of authority; “it is equally possible that Congress granted the power out of uncertainty, understandable caution, and a desire to avoid litigation”)
-
(unexpected absence of two prosecution witnesses)
Cited by 119 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals76
- Federal District Courts16
- Bankruptcy Courts2
- State Highest Courts18
- State Appellate Courts7
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency
- The Motor and Equipment Manufacturers Association, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Automobile Importers of America and State of California
- State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.
- National Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. Weinberger
- In re Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor. Consolidated Appeals of Railway Labor Executives' Association . State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation, State of South Dakota, Port of Pend Oreille, Pend Oreille Valley Railroad Company, Inc., and Seattle and North Coast Railroad Company, Intervening
- In re Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.