Moore v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
Moore v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission
Moore v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 417 U.S. 935 (1974)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding admission of certifícate of non-registration of destructive device, which recited that a diligent search was conducted and disclosed no registration, did not violate the defendant’s right of confrontation)
-
(which was decided prior to adoption of the Administrative Procedure Act, Chapter 120, Florida Statutes)
-
(inmate has a right to proper consideration of his eligibility for parole)
Cited by 86 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Dr. Joy HOCHSTADT v. WORCESTER FOUNDATION FOR EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
- Patricia SHEEHAN v. PUROLATOR COURIER CORPORATION and Purolator, Inc.
- Eldredge v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Joint Apprenticeship & Training Committee
- Margienell S. FISCHER v. Brock ADAMS
- Griffith v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COM'N
- FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COMM. v. Dornau
Most recent
- Robert E. Banks v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, etc.
- Hansen v. State
- Boykin v. Garrison
- Rigabar v. Broome
- Avera v. Barton
- 63 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 353, 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,689 Delbert C. Knopp v. John Magaw, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, United States Department of the Treasury
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.