Withrow v. Larkin
Withrow v. Larkin, 417 U.S. 943 (1974)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Appeal from D. C. E. D. Wis. Probable jurisdiction noted.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 4 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(repeated actions of participants in scheme sufficient to show intent and to preclude finding of mistake or naivete)
-
(different teams of people staged automobile collisions in various parts of Louisiana for the common purpose of defrauding insurers)
-
(revelation of criminal records of co-defendants is not so prejudical as to warrant a severance)
-
(conspiracy among numerous individuals, including doctors and lawyers, to stage automobile accidents and to file and collect for fraudulent insurance claims)
Cited by 122 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- United States v. Charles Vinson, United States of America v. Arlie B. Thompson
- United States v. Robert Hilton Swanson and Jack Lavoied Phipps
- United States v. Edward Baldarrama, Matias G
- Chapman v. State
- United States v. John L. Morrow
- United States v. Ronald Berkowitz, Paul D'alessandro, Kevin Van Coughnett, Bisan Vafaie, and Wendall Howell
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.