TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. Borel

Fibreboard Paper Prods. Corp. v. Borel, 419 U.S. 869 (1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 15, 1974
Docket
No. 74-47
Citations
419 U.S. 86995 S. Ct. 127

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (in a friction products asbestos case, the court noted that it was impossible as a practical matter to determine which of multiple exposures resulted in injury, and allowed plaintiff to present a cumulative exposure causation theory)

Cited by 19 cases

View all citing references →
1979: 11981: 21982: 11983: 11984: 21985: 21987: 21988: 11989: 11990: 11997: 11998: 12006: 319792026peak 2006 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Brisboy v. Fibreboard Corp.418 N.W.2d 650 (Mich. 1988)
  2. Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co.568 A.2d 1196 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989)
  3. Purvis v. PPG Industries, Inc.502 So. 2d 714 (Ala. 1987)
  4. McConnell v. Union Carbide Corp.937 So. 2d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
  5. Shackil v. Lederle Laboratories530 A.2d 1287 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1987)
  6. In re Asbestos Litigation911 A.2d 1176 (Del. Super. Ct. 2006)

Most recent

  1. In re Asbestos Litigation911 A.2d 1176 (Del. Super. Ct. 2006)
  2. McConnell v. Union Carbide Corp.937 So. 2d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
  3. In re Asbestos Litigation900 A.2d 120 (Del. Super. Ct. 2006)
  4. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Sitz970 S.W.2d 103 (Tex. App.—Eastland 1998)
  5. Lawley v. Chevron Chemical Co.720 So. 2d 918 (Ala. Civ. App. 1997) · Dissent
  6. McGuire v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.790 S.W.2d 842 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1990)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list