United States v. Bankers Trust Co.

United States v. Bankers Trust Co., Trustees

United States v. Bankers Trust Co., 419 U.S. 883 (1974)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 15, 1974
Docket: No. 73-1672
Citations: 419 U.S. 88395 S. Ct. 14742 L. Ed. 2d 1221974 U.S. LEXIS 2877

Cited by 104 9 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion to substitute Bank of New York et al. in place of Morgan Guaranty-Trust Company of New York as parties respondent granted. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 9 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(confining scope of review to controlling question of law and not factual issues presented in question certified by district court)

48 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1010, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,460 Richard Sperling, Frederick Hemsley & Joseph Zelauskas v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc., 862 F.2d 439 (3d Cir. 1989)
(discussing the Commission’s characterization of boiler fuel as an inferior use)

Consol. Edison Co. v. Comm'n, 676 F.2d 763 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
(destruction of plaintiff’s legal materials taken from another inmate’s prison cell held ministerial; issuance of prison regulations governing such destruction held discretionary)

Sami v. United States, 617 F.2d 755 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
(end use plans do not reallocate natural gas within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. Sec. 717f(a))

The Process Gas Consumers Group v. U.S. Dep't of Agric., Bob Bergland, Sec'y of Agric., United Gas Pipe Line Co., 694 F.2d 778 (1st Cir. 1982)
(questions on immunity, which are purely legal in nature, are appropriate for resolution by way of an interlocutory appeal)

United States v. A Parcel of Land, 742 F. Supp. 189 (D.N.J. 1990)
("[I]t is the order that is appealable, and not the controlling question identified by the district court. Thus, the court of appeals may address any issue necessary to decide the case before it.")

Lucien B. Calhoun Robin L. Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp., 40 F.3d 622 (3d Cir. 1994)
(end use plans are not per se discriminatory)

Process Gas Consumers Group v. U.S. Dep't of Agric., 694 F.2d 778 (D.C. Cir. 1982)

Cited by 104 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

In re VALUATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER §§ 303 (C) & 306439 F. Supp. 1351 (Regl. Rail Reorg. Act 1977)
City of Willcox and Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, San Diego Gas & Electric Co., American Smelting and Refining Co., Southern Union Gas Co., General Motors Corporation, El Paso Natural Gas Co., Navajo Tribal Utility Authority, Department of Water and Power, Etc., the People of the State of California, Etc., Tucson Gas & Electric Co., Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Nevada Power Company, Southwest Gas Corporation, Southwest Natural Gas Consumers, Arizona Fuel Users Association, Pioneer Natural Gas Co.567 F.2d 394 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
Briggs v. Goodwin569 F.2d 10 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
City of Willcox v. Federal Power Commission567 F.2d 394 (D.C. Cir. 1977) · Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part
Briggs v. Goodwin569 F.2d 10 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
In re Chicago, Missouri & Western Railway Co.90 B.R. 344 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1988)

Most recent

P. Schoenfeld Asset Management LLC v. Cendant Corp.161 F. Supp. 2d 355 (D.N.J. 2001)
In re Cendant Corp. Securities Litigation166 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.N.J. 2001)
Hudson United Bank v. Chase Manhattan Bank of Connecticut, N.A.43 F.3d 843 (3d Cir. 1994)
Hudson United Bank v. Chase Manhattan Bank of Connecticut, N.A.43 F.3d 843 (3d Cir. 1994)
Lucien B. Calhoun Robin L. Calhoun, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Natalie K. Calhoun, Deceased v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. Palmas Del Mar Company Palmas Del Mar, Inc. Palmas Yacht Club, Inc. Marina De Palmas Yacht Club, Inc. Maxxam Properties, Inc. Abc Corporation Xyz Partnership(s) Candelero Hotel Corporation Marina De Palmas Shipyard, Inc. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. And Yamaha Motor Company, Ltd., in No. 93-1736 Lucien B. Calhoun Robin L. Calhoun, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Natalie K40 F.3d 622 (3d Cir. 1994)
Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp.40 F.3d 622 (3d Cir. 1994)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list