Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ohio. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 415 U. S. 974 .] Brief for appellants does not comply with this Court’s Rules 39 and 40 with respect to conciseness, statement of questions without unnecessary detail, and printing of appendices thereto. Accordingly, as provided in paragraph 5 of Rule 40, brief of appellants is hereby stricken. Counsel for appellants may file a brief complying with the Rules within 20 days of the date of this order. Oral argument will be allowed only by counsel who have filed briefs that conform to the Rules.
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(state charge of robbery; federal charge of bank robbery)
-
(five year residency requirement for gubernatorial candidates)
Cited by 38 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court1
- U.S. Courts of Appeals18
- Federal District Courts8
- State Highest Courts7
- State Appellate Courts3
- State Attorney General Opinions1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- In re Contest of November 8, 2011 General Election of Office of New Jersey General Assembly, Fourth Legislative District
- Attorney General Opinion No.
- In re Ass'n of Trial Lawyers of Am.
- Reproductive Health Service v. Webster
- Planned Parenthood Association/chicago Area, an Illinois Not-For-Profit Corporation v. Chicago Transit Authority
- Helminski v. Supreme Court of Colorado
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.