Persico v. United States

Persico v. United States, 419 U.S. 924 (1974)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 21, 1974
Docket: No. 73-1741
Judges: Alone, Certiorari
Citations: 419 U.S. 92495 S. Ct. 199

Cited by 32 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari as to Pérsico alone.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(concluded that a witness could invoke § 2515 in only three narrow circumstances: (1) in the absence of a necessary court order (authorizing the wiretap), (2) if the government concedes the wiretap was unlawful, or (3)

Grand Jury Proceedings, Grand Jury No. 87-4, Empaneled September 9, 1987 (Two Cases). United States v. (Under Seal), (Two Cases), 856 F.2d 685 (4th Cir. 1988)

Cited by 32 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

In re Grand Jury Subpoena of Alphonse Persico522 F.2d 41 (2d Cir. 1975)
United States v. Manuszak438 F. Supp. 613 (E.D. Pa. 1977)
In re Grand Jury Investigation John Harkins. Appeal of John Harkins624 F.2d 1160 (3d Cir. 1980)
In re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Nicholas Katsouros613 F.2d 1171 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
United States v. Miller116 F.3d 641 (2d Cir. 1997)
Michael L. Shakman, and v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, and City of Chicago and Michael Cardilli533 F.2d 344 (7th Cir. 1976)

Most recent

Lebron v. United States267 F. Supp. 2d 325 (E.D.N.Y. 2003)
United States v. Miller116 F.3d 641 (2d Cir. 1997)
Grand Jury Proceedings, Grand Jury No. 87-4, Empaneled September 9, 1987 (Two Cases). United States of America v. (Under Seal), (Two Cases)856 F.2d 685 (4th Cir. 1988)
Sallyann Stoddard v. United States710 F.2d 21 (2d Cir. 1983)
In re Cook County Grand Jury447 N.E.2d 862 (Ill. App. Ct. 1983)
People v. Taddeo447 N.E.2d 862 (Ill. App. Ct. 1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list