TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Nagle v. Rutledge

Nagle v. Rutledge, 100 U.S. 675 (1880)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
April 26, 1880
Docket
No. 275
Judges
Waite
Citations
100 U.S. 67525 L. Ed. 7721879 U.S. LEXIS 1868
Headnotes
This court has no jurisdiction to review the judgment of the Supreme Court of the Territory.of Wyoming, unless the record shows that the matter actually. in dispute exceeds $1,000.
Summary
Motion to dismiss a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Wyoming. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Waite

Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court.

To give us jurisdiction in cases coming from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Wyoming, the value of the matter in dispute must exceed $1,000. This writ of error was sued out by the defendant below on a judgment against .him for' only $969.68. It is claimed we have jurisdiction, however, because the defendant in his answer set up a counter claim for $1,840. The only question presented here on that branch of the case is whether the plaintiff below was liable for interest. on a note of $210, at the rate of three per cent a month from the twenty-fourth day of June, 1872, until the date of the judgment, July 26, 1876, or for some- shorter period." In -no event could the amount thus put in controversy reach $1,000; and since if error should be found in. the charge of the court on this claim, it would only result in a reduction of the judgment as it now stands, and not in an actual money recovery in favor of the defendant below, it follows that our jurisdiction is not shown by the record, and that the suit must be dismissed.

So ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1899: 11913: 21923: 118992026peak 1913 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Smith v. Wilkins80 S.E. 168 (N.C. 1913)
  2. Smith v. Wilkins164 N.C. 135 (1913)
  3. Crosby v. Crosby49 S.W. 359 (Tex. 1899)
  4. State v. Plummer119 S.E. 488 (N.C. 1923)

Most recent

  1. State v. Plummer119 S.E. 488 (N.C. 1923)
  2. Smith v. Wilkins80 S.E. 168 (N.C. 1913)
  3. Smith v. Wilkins164 N.C. 135 (1913)
  4. Crosby v. Crosby49 S.W. 359 (Tex. 1899)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list