Lake Oswego School District No. 7 v. Hutchison
Lake Oswego Sch. Dist. No. 7 v. Hutchison, 429 U.S. 1033 (1977)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, ante, p. 125.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(school officials entitled to official immunity despite having violated Title VII by denying sick leave to pregnant teacher)
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Wilson v. Wayne County
- Durning v. Citibank
- Durning v. CitiBank, N.A.
- Mountain States Tel. & Tel. v. COM'R OF LABOR
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Commissioner of Labor & Industry
- 15 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1358, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7862 Women in City Government United, Barbara Robertson, Leslie Boyarsky, Jacquelin Gross, Arlene Friedman, Robert Sussman, Alicia Cantelmi, Pamela Mills, Susan Pass, Linda Zises, Emily Blitz, Susan Padwee, Elaine Justic, Eula Carter and Linda Shah, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. The City of New York, Abraham Beame as Mayor of the City of New York, John v. Lindsay, Harry Bronstein, as City Personnel Director, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, New York City Housing Authority, New York City Off-Track Betting Corporation, Joseph Monserrat, Seymour P. Lachman, Isaiah E. Robinson, Jr., Mary E. Meade, Constituting the Board of Education of the City of New York, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Greater New York, Group Health Incorporated, Social Services Employees Union, Social Services Employees Union Welfare Fund, District Council 37, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, District Council 37, Health & Security Plan, United Federation of Teachers and United Federation of Teachers Welfare Fund
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.