Rose v. United States

Rose v. United States, 430 U.S. 908 (1977)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: February 28, 1977
Docket: No. 76-5522
Citations: 430 U.S. 90851 L. Ed. 2d 584

Cited by 49 8 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 8 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(holding that “a restriction on a defendant’s right to consult with his attorney during a brief routine recess is constitutionally impermissible,” and reversing the conviction of a co-defendant witness ordered not to talk to her lawyer during an overnight recess)

United States v. Romano, 736 F.2d 1432 (11th Cir. 1984)
(grave doubts whether brief restrictions during trial recesses can be squared with Geders; conviction reversed on other grounds)

United States v. Dilapi, 651 F.2d 140 (2d Cir. 1981)
(mere discrepancy between dates of conspiracy contained in the order of extradition and those in the indictment not a violation of the principal of specialty)

United States v. El-Jassem, 819 F. Supp. 166 (E.D.N.Y. 1993)
(defendant arrested without warrant retained in custody more than twenty hours without filing of formal charge in violation of statute requiring release if no charge brought within twenty hours of seizure)

State v. Simpson, 357 S.E.2d 332 (N.C. 1987)
(blanket restriction imposed during lunch recess)

State v. Fusco, 461 A.2d 1169 (N.J. 1983)
(per se rule applied prospectively)

Crutchfield v. Wainwright, 803 F.2d 1103 (11th Cir. 1986)

Cited by 49 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Donald Ray Perry v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections Attorney General of South Carolina832 F.2d 837 (4th Cir. 1987)
United States v. Jack Rose731 F.2d 1337 (8th Cir. 1984)
Barney Earl Crutchfield v. Louie L. Wainwright, Jim Smith803 F.2d 1103 (11th Cir. 1986)
State v. Mebane529 A.2d 680 (Conn. 1987)
1616 Reminc Ltd. Partnership v. Atchison & Keller Co.704 F.2d 1313 (4th Cir. 1983)
In re 1616 Reminc Limited Partnership704 F.2d 1313 (4th Cir. 1983)

Most recent

KOPP v. Fischer811 F. Supp. 2d 696 (W.D.N.Y. 2011)
Lancaster v. State948 A.2d 102 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2008)
United States v. Jose Ortiz-Martinez188 F. App'x 530 (8th Cir. 2006)
United States v. Gines-Perez214 F. Supp. 2d 205 (D.P.R. 2002)
United States v. Chaim Levy25 F.3d 146 (2d Cir. 1994)
United States v. Billy J. Morgan997 F.2d 433 (8th Cir. 1993)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list