Kerr v. United States

Kerr v. United States, 431 U.S. 972 (1977)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: June 13, 1977
Docket: No. 76-6749
Citations: 431 U.S. 97253 L. Ed. 2d 1070

Cited by 80 5 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(finding testimony about the defendant’s desire or request for a lawyer error)

State v. Dexter, 954 S.W.2d 332 (Mo. 1997)
(delay that prohibited defendant from serving concurrent sentence in state and federal prison was not substantial hardship)

United States v. Thomas White (91-4009) & Daniel Geiger (91-4039), 985 F.2d 271 (6th Cir. 1993)
(court properly denied defendant right to represent himself for summation)

Brown v. Wainwright, 665 F.2d 607 (5th Cir. 1982)
(statement constituted declarant’s business records)

Styers v. Smith, 501 F. Supp. 880 (W.D.N.Y. 1980)

Cited by 80 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Frank Daniel Williams v. Robert F. Zahradnick and the Attorney General of the State of Virginia632 F.2d 353 (4th Cir. 1980)
United States v. Don Lyndall Robbins613 F.2d 688 (8th Cir. 1979)
United States v. Claude Leander Riley657 F.2d 1377 (8th Cir. 1981)
United States v. Louis K. Bohr581 F.2d 1294 (8th Cir. 1978)
United States v. Thomas White (91-4009) and Daniel Geiger (91-4039)985 F.2d 271 (6th Cir. 1993)
United States v. Isaac N657 F.2d 985 (8th Cir. 1981)

Most recent

STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOSEPH BUNDY, JR. (13-05-0273, SALEM COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)No. A-3222-14T2 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. June 28, 2017)
United States v. Law526 F. Supp. 2d 513 (E.D. Pa. 2007)
Smith v. Maher468 F. Supp. 2d 466 (W.D.N.Y. 2006)
Galloway v. State809 A.2d 653 (Md. 2002)
Howard v. Lacy58 F. Supp. 2d 157 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)
State v. Feaster716 A.2d 395 (N.J. 1998)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list