California v. United States

California v. United States, 434 U.S. 984 (1977)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: December 5, 1977
Docket: No. 77-285
Citations: 434 U.S. 98498 S. Ct. 60854 L. Ed. 2d 4781977 U.S. LEXIS 4237

Cited by 62 5 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(such a condition "might be thought to bear a reasonable relationship to the treatment of the accused and the protection of the public.”)

UNITED STATES of Am. v. Eyler, 67 F.3d 1386 (9th Cir. 1995)
(where four defendants were allowed a total of twelve challenges and the Government was allowed seven)

United States v. Hooper, Jr., 575 F.2d 496 (5th Cir. 1978)
(under Rule 705, court was entitled to credit expert’s conclusion even though expert did not describe and explain the relevance of factors upon which his opinion rested; defendant neither cross-examined on basis for opinion nor attempted to show its inadequacy)

Symbol Techs., Inc. v. Opticon, Inc., 935 F.2d 1569 (Fed. Cir. 1991)

Cited by 62 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Merric166 F.3d 406 (1st Cir. 1999)
United States v. Steven Wayne Tyler767 F.2d 1350 (9th Cir. 1985)
United States v. James Michael Baker589 F.2d 1008 (9th Cir. 1979)
United States v. Merric166 F.3d 405 (1st Cir. 1999)
United States v. John Martin615 F.2d 318 (5th Cir. 1980)
United States v. Lewis Davis Michel, Robert Joseph Belmares, John Handy Jones, Daniel Stewart Henshaw and Ted Ray Hines588 F.2d 986 (5th Cir. 1979)

Most recent

Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.313 F. Supp. 2d 951 (N.D. Iowa 2004)
United States v. Merric166 F.3d 406 (1st Cir. 1999)
United States v. Merric166 F.3d 405 (1st Cir. 1999)
Lambright v. Lewis932 F. Supp. 1547 (D. Ariz. 1996)
UNITED STATES of America v. Donald John LORENZINI71 F.3d 1489 (9th Cir. 1995)
United States v. Uphoff907 F. Supp. 1475 (D. Kan. 1995)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list