London v. United States
London v. United States Genco v. United States and Shade v. United States
London v. United States, 436 U.S. 930 (1978)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Brennan would grant cer-tiorari.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(approving blanket surveillance of numbers operation in order to determine the participants)
-
(in investigation of gambling operation, fact that the government has ample evidence to arrest known participants does not preclude it from seeking wiretap order to uncover names of bookmakers and other co-conspirators)
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.