DiCarlo v. United States
DiCarlo v. United States, 439 U.S. 834 (1978)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 10 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(upholding the imposition of preclusionary and monetary sanctions where the resisting party had stopped claiming that foreign law forbade discovery and noting that “Andersen acted in bad faith and the balancing was heavily on Ohio’s side”)
-
(“Particularly is there a heavy burden on a defendant when the facts were known to him from the beginning”)
-
(order imposing preclusionary and monetary sanctions for non-compliance with discovery orders was final and appealable)
-
(“Cooperation among counsel is not only helpful, but required, and the court has the duty to ensure that such cooperation is forthcoming.”)
-
(request for, inter alia, evidence which may tend to “impeach or discredit incriminatory evidence ... or which may lead to evidence of such character” considered a general request)
-
(First Circuit termed this “a classic example of a non-specific request as defined in Agurs." 575 F.2d at 959 (referring to Brady request in United States v. McCrane, 527 F.2d 906, 910 (3d Cir.1975)
-
("Where a jury has been clearly admonished not to read newspaper accounts of the trial in which they are serving as jurors, it is not to be presumed that they violated that admonition.")
-
(proof of defendant-taxpayer's involvement in illegal cash business justified dash method)
Cited by 119 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals67
- Federal District Courts36
- Bankruptcy Courts1
- State Highest Courts9
- State Appellate Courts6
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Angelo Cantone v. Superintendent, New York Correctional Facility at Green Haven, and Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New York
- Maurice Gregory v. United States
- State v. Reis
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.
- Fautek v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
- Remington Products, Inc. v. North American Philips Corp.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.