Campellone v. Adult Probation Department of Pima County

Campellone v. Adult Probation Department of Pima County, Arizona

Campellone v. Adult Prob. Dep't of Pima Cnty., 439 U.S. 933 (1978)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 30, 1978
Docket: No. 78-5303
Citations: 439 U.S. 93399 S. Ct. 32658 L. Ed. 2d 3281978 U.S. LEXIS 3636

Cited by 24 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(trial court could bar questions as to a witness’s homosexuality, since such sexual orientation “would have nothing to do with his credibility as a witness”)

Castro v. Sullivan, 662 F. Supp. 745 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)
(court refused to allow defense counsel to ask witness if he was homosexual)

United States v. Allen, 772 F.2d 1555 (11th Cir. 1985)

Cited by 24 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Luis Esteban Veytia-Bravo603 F.2d 1187 (5th Cir. 1979)
Michael Craft v. State of Alabama.90 So. 3d 197 (Ala. Crim. App. 2011)
People v. Balderas711 P.2d 480 (Cal. 1985)
Robert Green v. Charles Scully, Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional Facility850 F.2d 894 (2d Cir. 1988)
United States v. Pedro H. Valdez, Wasang Tomas Mock, Jorge Garcia, and Raul Rodriguez16 F.3d 1324 (2d Cir. 1994)
United States v. Jack Lee Scroggins939 F.2d 416 (7th Cir. 1991)

Most recent

Michael Craft v. State of Alabama.90 So. 3d 197 (Ala. Crim. App. 2011)
Huff v. State897 S.W.2d 829 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1995)
United States v. Pedro H. Valdez, Wasang Tomas Mock, Jorge Garcia, and Raul Rodriguez16 F.3d 1324 (2d Cir. 1994)
Cunningham v. United States Commissioner165 B.R. 599 (N.D. Tex. 1993)
United States v. Bell38 M.J. 523 (1993)
United States v. Garcia780 F. Supp. 166 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list