Sierra-Hernandez v. United States
Sierra-Hernandez v. United States, 439 U.S. 936 (1978)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 17 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(Justices Stewart and Marshall dissenting from the Court’s denial of writs of certiorari and contending that the Court should resolve the circuit split on this issue[.])
-
(“We perceive no error in the prosecution’s use of leading questions before the grand jury.”)
-
(J. Stewart and J. Marshall dissenting from denial of certiorari because of a difference among the courts of appeals on the admissibility of grand jury testimony under Rule 804(b)(5))
-
(“standards of reliability should not prevent appropriate police action when a victim of a crime immediately has contacted the police”)
-
(“Unlike a person who makes an anonymous phone call . .. the informant was in a position to be held accountable for his intervention. The reliability of the information was thus increased.”)
-
(reasonable suspicion established based on anonymous tip corroborated only by observations of innocent details)
-
(denial of petitions for writs of certiorari, Stewart, J. dissenting)
-
(unidentified individual told border patrol agent that a specifically described truck had just loaded with marijuana at a canebrake, agent knew canebrake to have been site of past smuggling activity and found the truck nearby--held sufficient to justify investigatory stop of truck)
Cited by 111 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court2
- U.S. Courts of Appeals52
- Federal District Courts14
- Military Courts5
- State Highest Courts13
- State Appellate Courts25
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.