Harris v. Ross

Harris, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development v. Ross Harris, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development v. Abrams

Harris v. Ross, 439 U.S. 1001 (1978)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: December 4, 1978
Docket: Nos. 76-1234; No. 76-1261
Citations: 439 U.S. 100199 S. Ct. 607

Cited by 7 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 4th Cir.; and

C. A. 9th Cir. [Cer-tiorari granted, 431 U. S. 928 .] Motion of the Solicitor General, with consent of respondents, for reference to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland [in No. 76-1234], and for reference to the United States District Court for the Central District of California [in No. 76-1261], to consider settlement granted.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(Congress did not intend to give the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development the discretion to decline to spend any of the money targeted for the operating subsidy program.)

John & Dolores Rank v. Robert P, 677 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1982)

Cited by 7 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Underwood v. Pierce547 F. Supp. 256 (C.D. Cal. 1982)
Dubose v. Harris82 F.R.D. 582 (D. Conn. 1979)
Underwood v. Pierce761 F.2d 1342 (9th Cir. 1985)
John and Dolores Rank v. Robert P677 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1982)
Rank v. Nimmo677 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1982)
United States v. Eugene T. Markgraf and Nancy J. Markgraf736 F.2d 1179 (7th Cir. 1984)

Most recent

Underwood v. Pierce761 F.2d 1342 (9th Cir. 1985)
United States v. Eugene T. Markgraf and Nancy J. Markgraf736 F.2d 1179 (7th Cir. 1984)
John and Dolores Rank v. Robert P677 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1982)
Underwood v. Pierce547 F. Supp. 256 (C.D. Cal. 1982)
Rank v. Nimmo677 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1982)
Russell v. Landrieu621 F.2d 1037 (9th Cir. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list