TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Borowski v. Depuy, Inc.

Chester BOROWSKI v. DEPUY, INC., and Stephen Bales

Borowski v. Depuy, Inc., 118 F.R.D. 445 (N.D. Ill. 1988)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, N.D. Illinois · Federal District Courts
Decided
January 21, 1988
Docket
No. 86 C 3258
Judges
Bua
Citations
118 F.R.D. 4451988 WL 42001988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 328

Opinion of the Court — Bua

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ORDER BUA, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s motion for leave of court to seek expedited discovery relating to defendants’ fee petitions is denied.

Following the amendment of Rule 11 in 1983, the Advisory Committee declared that courts should allow discovery concerning Rule 11 sanctions “only in extraordinary circumstances.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 advisory committee’s note. Plaintiff Chester Borowski has failed to demonstrate such extraordinary circumstances in the instant case. Moreover, discovery would be particularly inappropriate in this instance. In presenting their fee petitions, defendants Depuy, Inc. and Stephen Bales have included sufficient details to render additional discovery unnecessary. Consequently, Bo-rowski’s motion seeking discovery related to the fee petitions is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list