TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Young

Aetna Life & Cas. Co. v. Young, 454 U.S. 1026 (1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
November 9, 1981
Docket
No. 81-533
Judges
Consideration, Took
Citations
454 U.S. 1026102 S. Ct. 56070 L. Ed. 2d 47050 U.S.L.W. 33751981 U.S. LEXIS 4367
Cited by 40 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal from Super. Ct. Conn., Fairfield County, dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.

Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 40 cases

View all citing references →
1981: 11982: 21983: 11984: 11985: 31986: 21987: 11988: 11989: 51990: 11992: 21993: 11995: 21997: 21998: 12000: 42001: 42003: 12004: 12006: 12009: 12012: 12014: 119812026peak 1989 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Drew Associates of N.J., L.P. v. Travisano561 A.2d 1177 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989)
  2. Distinctive Printing & Packaging Co. v. Cox443 N.W.2d 566 (Neb. 1989)
  3. Bryan v. Kitamura529 F. Supp. 394 (D. Haw. 1982)
  4. Temistocles Ramirez De Arellano v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Defense745 F.2d 1500 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  5. Moriarty v. Bradt827 A.2d 203 (N.J. 2003)
  6. Caviglia v. Royal Tours of America842 A.2d 125 (N.J. 2004)

Most recent

  1. State of New Jersey v. James Buckner96 A.3d 261 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2014)
  2. Depascale v. State47 A.3d 690 (N.J. 2012) · Dissent
  3. Abbott ex rel. Abbott v. Burke971 A.2d 989 (N.J. 2009)
  4. State v. Crawley901 A.2d 924 (N.J. 2006)
  5. Caviglia v. Royal Tours of America842 A.2d 125 (N.J. 2004)
  6. Moriarty v. Bradt827 A.2d 203 (N.J. 2003)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list