Whittaker v. Whittaker Corp.

Whittaker v. Whittaker Corp., 454 U.S. 1031 (1981)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: November 9, 1981
Docket: No. 80-1903
Citations: 454 U.S. 1031102 S. Ct. 56670 L. Ed. 2d 47350 U.S.L.W. 33751981 U.S. LEXIS 4390

Cited by 67 7 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 7 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(motion to retax costs characterized as Rule 59(e) motion to allow for timely filing of notice of appeal)

Bordallo v. Reyes, 763 F.2d 1098 (9th Cir. 1985)
(motion labeled Rule 54(d) motion construed as Rule 59(e) motion)

Taylor v. MacE Knapp, 871 F.2d 803 (9th Cir. 1989)
(both the EAHCA and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 applied.)

Espino v. Besteiro, 708 F.2d 1002 (5th Cir. 1983)

Cited by 67 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Doe v. Maher793 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1986)
Citadel Holding Corp., a Delaware Corporation v. Alfred Roven American Underwriters, Inc., a Delaware Corporation26 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 1994)
Christopher W. v. Portsmouth School Committee, Etc.877 F.2d 1089 (1st Cir. 1989)
Ricardo J. Bordallo, Governor of Guam v. Tony Reyes, Taro Kanai, Roberto Olaya, and Carl Peterson763 F.2d 1098 (9th Cir. 1985)
Turillo v. Tyson535 F. Supp. 577 (D.R.I. 1982)
School Board of the County of Prince William, Virginia v. Jerry T. Malone Verda J762 F.2d 1210 (4th Cir. 1985)

Most recent

Dean v. SCH. DIST. OF CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, NY615 F. Supp. 2d 63 (W.D.N.Y. 2009)
Chavez ex rel. Chavez v. Board of Education614 F. Supp. 2d 1184 (D.N.M. 2009)
Wilson v. Preston662 S.E.2d 580 (S.C. 2008)
Dreiling ex rel. Infospace, Inc. v. Jain281 F. Supp. 2d 1234 (W.D. Wash. 2003)
Dreiling ex rel. Infospace, Inc. v. Kellett281 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (W.D. Wash. 2003)
Weast v. Schaffer240 F. Supp. 2d 396 (D. Maryland 2002)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list