LaBar Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

LaBar Enterprises, Inc. v. United States and LaBar v. United States

LaBar Enters. v. United States, 459 U.S. 945 (1982)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 18, 1982
Docket: Nos. 82-421; No. 82-431
Citations: 459 U.S. 945103 S. Ct. 26074 L. Ed. 2d 20251 U.S.L.W. 33041982 U.S. LEXIS 4010

Cited by 41 3 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 688 F. 2d 826 .

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(distinguishing Henderson in conspiracy case and noting that it is not followed in any reported decision)

United States v. Standard Drywall Corp., 617 F. Supp. 1283 (E.D.N.Y. 1985)
(disfavoring abstention where federal question controls)

In re Abbott Lab'ys, 51 F.3d 524 (5th Cir. 1995)

Cited by 41 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

In re Abbott Laboratories51 F.3d 524 (5th Cir. 1995)
Gilmer v. Walt Disney Co.915 F. Supp. 1001 (W.D. Ark. 1996)
Borgeson v. Archer-Daniels Midland Co.909 F. Supp. 709 (C.D. Cal. 1995)
In re Potash Antitrust Litigation866 F. Supp. 406 (D. Minnesota 1994)
Neve Bros. v. Potash Corp.866 F. Supp. 406 (D. Minnesota 1994)
Galt G/S v. JSS Scandinavia142 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 1998)

Most recent

Energy XXI, Gom, LLC v. New Tech Engineering, L.P.787 F. Supp. 2d 590 (S.D. Tex. 2011)
United States v. Ohle678 F. Supp. 2d 215 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)
Michael Spielman v. Genzyme Corp. And Genzyme Development Corp.251 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2001)
Peterson v. BASF Corp.12 F. Supp. 2d 964 (D. Minnesota 1998)
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3108, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4313 Galt G/s v. Jss Scandinavia D & D Services Crystal Ice & Cold Storage Co. v142 F.3d 1150 (3d Cir. 1998)
Lauchheimer v. Gulf Oil6 F. Supp. 2d 339 (D.N.J. 1998)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list