TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Citation of Unpublished Opinions/Orders & Judgments

In re CITATION OF UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS/ORDERS AND JUDGMENTS

In re Citation of Unpublished Opinions/Orders & Judgments, 151 F.R.D. 470 (10th Cir. 1993)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 29, 1993
Citations
151 F.R.D. 4701993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37746

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

GENERAL ORDER

By this General Order the court suspends 10th Cir.R. 36.3 from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 1995, or until further order of court. While the rule is suspended, citation of unpublished opinions and orders and judgments shall be governed by the following provisions:

Unpublished opinions and orders and judgments of this court are not binding precedents, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. Citation of these unpublished decisions is not favored. Nevertheless, if it is believed that an unpublished opinion or order and judgment has persuasive value with respect to a material issue in a case and would assist the court in its disposition, that decision may be cited, provided that a copy of the decision is attached to the brief or other document in which it is cited, or, if cited in oral argument, is provided to the court and all other parties.

During the pendency of this order, the court will evaluate the effectiveness of the provisions contained herein. The court invites interested parties to send written comments to the clerk of court. After evaluation, the court will decide whether the order should be vacated or its provisions should be incorporated into the rules of court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 25 cases

View all citing references →
1995: 12023: 42024: 102025: 42026: 619952026peak 2024 · 10

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Marta Tarbell v. Wick Communications Corp.56 F.3d 78 (10th Cir. 1995)
  2. Nissen v. POTUSNo. 1:23-cv-00936 (D.N.M. Nov. 29, 2023)
  3. Skaggs v. SantistevanNo. 2:22-cv-00050 (D.N.M. Nov. 29, 2023)
  4. McClendon v. Albuquerque, City ofNo. 6:95-cv-00024 (D.N.M. Oct. 11, 2023)
  5. Sacoman v. SantistevanNo. 2:21-cv-00045 (D.N.M. Nov. 30, 2023)
  6. Rivera v. State of New MexicoNo. 2:23-cv-00463 (D.N.M. Jan. 29, 2024)

Most recent

  1. Rachel Higgins, personal representative of the Estate of Matthew Garcia v. City of Albuquerque, Harold Medina, Precious Cadena, in their individual and official capacities, Zach Earles, in their individual and official capacities, Howard Perry, in their individual and official capacities, Dominic Castro, in their individual and official capacities, Amir Nathoo, William Gallegos, Samuel SeayNo. 1:25-cv-00673 (D.N.M. July 16, 2026)
  2. Rogelio Bolufe Izquierdo v. Melissa Ortiz, Warden, Torrance County Detention Facility; Joel Garia, Field Office Director, El Paso Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Todd M. Lyons, Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security; and Pamela Jo Bondi, United States Attorney GeneralNo. 1:25-cv-01304 (D.N.M. June 30, 2026)
  3. Dean M. Rieck v. Alfred Sanchez and Kim StewartNo. 2:25-cv-00066 (D.N.M. June 1, 2026)
  4. Jose Luis Bugueno Pena v. Carlos A. Rodriguez, State of New Mexico, FNU LNU, Warden, Otero County Processing Center, Mary De Anda-Ybarra, Field Office Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations, El Paso Field Office Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Krist Noem, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and Pamela Bondi, U.S. Attorney GeneralNo. 2:25-cv-01310 (D.N.M. May 19, 2026)
  5. Brandon K. Kuykendall v. New Mexico Judicial Standards CommissionNo. 2:25-cv-00608 (D.N.M. Feb. 27, 2026)
  6. Christopher Burke v. George Stephenson, and Attorney General of the State of New MexicoNo. 2:24-cv-01080 (D.N.M. Jan. 30, 2026)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list