Paul v. United States
Paul v. United States, 461 U.S. 927 (1983)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(finding that a reverse stock split is legal under Missouri law)
-
("When the FSLIC is acting in its role as receiver under state law, the applicable substantive law is state rather than federal.")
-
(district court had subject matter jurisdiction over FDIC’s suit under Illinois law where FDIC was suing in its corporate capacity)
-
(§ 13 provides incentive to choose partners carefully)
Cited by 46 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals32
- Federal District Courts6
- Bankruptcy Courts3
- Federal Specialty Courts1
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts3
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Kansas Bankers Surety Company
- Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. Ticktin
- U.S. Customs Service, Region II v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, National Treasury Employees Union
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.
- U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
- Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Ticktin
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.