Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission
Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission and National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motions of Maryland Office of People’s Counsel, Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, Florida Public Service Commission, South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs, and Utah Public Service Commission for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Motion of Arkansas et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in No. 82-1331 granted. Certiorari denied.
Justice Blackmun and Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and these petitions.
Reported below: 224 U. S. App. D. C. 83, 693 F. 2d 198 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals5
- Federal District Courts1
- Federal Specialty Courts1
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Carlin Communication, Inc., Etc. v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Etc.
- At & T Information Systems v. South Dakota State Board of Equalization
- National Association Of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission
- Dade County v. AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS
- Tenneco Gas v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Pacific Ideas, Inc.
Most recent
- Tenneco Gas v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Pacific Ideas, Inc.
- National Association Of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission
- At & T Information Systems v. South Dakota State Board of Equalization
- Carlin Communication, Inc., Etc. v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Etc.
- Dunn Trust v. Commissioner
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.