TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cross v. General Motors Corp.

Cross v. Gen. Motors Corp., 466 U.S. 980 (1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 14, 1984
Docket
No. 83-1567
Judges
Consideration, Took
Citations
466 U.S. 980104 S. Ct. 236480 L. Ed. 2d 83652 U.S.L.W. 382940 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 4321984 U.S. LEXIS 223334 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,346
Cited by 99 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice O’Connor took no part in the *981 consideration or decision of this petition.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 99 cases

View all citing references →
1984: 111985: 131986: 151987: 161988: 181989: 71990: 51991: 21992: 31993: 11994: 21995: 11996: 21997: 11998: 12020: 119842026peak 1988 · 18

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hernando Williams v. James Chrans and Neil F. Hartigan945 F.2d 926 (7th Cir. 1991)
  2. Williams v. Chrans742 F. Supp. 472 (N.D. Ill. 1990)
  3. Williams v. Illinois; Dixon v466 U.S. 981 (1984)
  4. People v. Johnson502 N.E.2d 304 (Ill. App. Ct. 1986)
  5. People v. Brown505 N.E.2d 397 (Ill. App. Ct. 1987)
  6. People v. Crowder515 N.E.2d 783 (Ill. App. Ct. 1987)

Most recent

  1. Villegas v. City of El PasoNo. 3:15-cv-00386 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2020)
  2. Accountability (a.k.a. "Boss Einstein") Burns v. Veterans Administration, Sued As: Va/varo-Muskogee, Muskogee Ok 74401, (Judicial Officer Tracy)162 F.3d 1172 (10th Cir. 1998)
  3. In re Stephenson205 B.R. 52 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1997)
  4. Sistrunk v. Vaughn96 F.3d 666 (3d Cir. 1996)
  5. State v. Hightower680 A.2d 649 (N.J. 1996)
  6. Hernando Williams v. James Chrans and Neil F. Hartigan50 F.3d 1358 (7th Cir. 1995)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list