TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rosenblatt v. Johnston

Rosenblatt v. Johnston, 104 U.S. 462 (1882)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 16, 1882
Docket
No. 667
Judges
Waite
Citations
104 U.S. 46226 L. Ed. 8321881 U.S. LEXIS 2025
Headnotes
The personal property of an insolvent national hank in the hands of a receiver appointed pursuant to sect. 5234 of the Revised Statutes is exempt from taxation under State laws.
Summary
- Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the' Eastern District of Missouri. This is a bill in equity, filed Sept. 80, 1880, by Rosenblatt, collector'of the city of St. Louis, against Johnston, receiver'of the National Bank of the State of Missouri. The bank was duly incorporated pursuant to the act of Congress of June 3, 1864, c. 106 (13 Stat. p. 99), and the acts amendatory thereof, and had its situs in that city. It suspended payment June 9, 1877. Shortly thereafter Johnston was, -by the Comptroller of the Currency, ‘appointed such receiver. He then took possession of its assets, and disposed of them in the settlement of its liabilities. The bill avers that while in his hands the assets were subject to taxation under the laws of that State for the support of the State government, the government of the city, and the public schools, in like manner and to the same extent and effect as all other taxable -personal property in the city during the same period; that the assessment of taxes for the years 1877 and 1878 was duly made; that the fund in his hands is sufficient to pay them ; and that the shares of the bank since his appointment have been absolutely worthless. It prays for an order upon him to pay the taxes out of that fund, and for general relief. The court sustained a demurrer to the bill, and Rosenblatt appealed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Waite

Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court.

The .single question in this case is, whether the personal assets and personal property of an insolvent national bank in the hands of a receiver appointed by the Comptroller of the Currency, in accordance with the provision of sect. 5234 of the" Éevised Statutes, are exempt from taxation under State laws, and we have no hesitation in saying that in our opinion they are. Such property and assets, in legal contemplation, still belong to the bank, though in tfie hands of a receiver, to be' administered under the law. The bank did not cease to exist on the appointment of the receiver. Its corporate capacity continues until its affairs are finally wound up and its assets distributed. ■ Bank of Bethel v. Pahquioque Bank, 14 Wall. 383 ;

Kennedy v. Gibson, 8 id. 498 ;

Bank v. Kennedy, 17 id. 19. If the shares have any value, they are taxable in the hands of the holders or owners, under sect. 5219 of the Revised Statutes ; but the property held by the receiver is exempt to the same extent it was before his appointment.

Decree affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 55 cases

View all citing references →
1883–1884: 31885–1886: 21893–1894: 11895–1896: 21897–1898: 41899–1900: 11903–1904: 11905–1906: 11907–1908: 11909–1910: 21911–1912: 11915–1916: 11917–1918: 31919–1920: 11923–1924: 31925–1926: 11927–1928: 31929–1930: 11931–1932: 11933–1934: 21935–1936: 71937–1938: 41939–1940: 31941–1942: 11945–1946: 11947–1948: 11965–1966: 11967–1968: 11979–1980: 118832026peak 1935 · 7

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Roberts v. American National Bank of Pensacola121 So. 554 (Fla. 1929)
  2. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. McDonald289 F. Supp. 493 (W.D. Okla. 1968)
  3. State ex rel. Rankin v. Madison State Bank218 P. 652 (Mont. 1923)
  4. State ex rel. First Trust & Savings Bank of Billings v. District Court146 P. 539 (Mont. 1915)
  5. Wittnebel v. Loughman80 F.2d 222 (2d Cir. 1935)
  6. Wilson v. First State Bank95 P. 404 (Kan. 1908)

Most recent

  1. Maldonado v. Flynn413 A.2d 1251 (Del. Ch. 1980)
  2. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. McDonald289 F. Supp. 493 (W.D. Okla. 1968)
  3. National Metropolitan Bank of Washington v. United States345 F.2d 823 (Ct. Cl. 1965)
  4. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Town of West Haven62 A.2d 671 (Conn. 1948)
  5. Rist v. Hartvigsen19 N.W.2d 830 (S.D. 1945)
  6. Untitled Texas Attorney General OpinionNo. O-3608 (Tex. Att'y Gen. July 2, 1941)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Bank of Bethel v. Pahquioque Bank, 81 U.S. (14 Wall.) 383 (1872) 108

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list