Murphy v. United States
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
Mr. Chief Justice Waite delivered the opinion of the court.
■ We are clearly of the opinion that the acceptance by the claimant, without objection, of the amount allowed b.y the Secretary of the Navy, in his adjustment of the account presented to him, was equivalent to a final ¿ettlement arid compromise of all the items of the present claim included in that account. There is nothing in the findings of the court below to warrant a judgment in favor of the claimant upon the only item *465 included in the petition in this case which was not mentioned specifically in the account presented to the Secretary of the Navy and passed on by him in the adjustment he made.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 14 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Johnson v. Gallatin Valley Milling Co.
- Deal v. Federal Housing Administration
- H. B. Deal, M. M. Glucksman and J. A. Laughren, Statutory Trustees of Lucas-Hunt Village, Inc., a Corporation ( ) v. Federal Housing Administration ( ) the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, a Corporation ( ) v. Federal Housing Administration ( )
- Pope v. United States
- St. L., B. & M. Ry. v. United States
- St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. United States
Most recent
- H. B. Deal, M. M. Glucksman and J. A. Laughren, Statutory Trustees of Lucas-Hunt Village, Inc., a Corporation ( ) v. Federal Housing Administration ( ) the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, a Corporation ( ) v. Federal Housing Administration ( )
- Deal v. Federal Housing Administration
- Pope v. United States
- St. L., B. & M. Ry. v. United States
- St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. United States
- Johnson v. Gallatin Valley Milling Co.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.