United States v. Cassity

United States v. Cassity, 468 U.S. 1212 (1984)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: July 5, 1984
Docket: No. 83-1393
Citations: 468 U.S. 1212104 S. Ct. 358182 L. Ed. 2d 87952 U.S.L.W. 39371984 U.S. LEXIS 2814

Cited by 33 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded *1213 for further consideration in light of United States v. Leon, ante, p. 897.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(discussing Knotts as relying on the automobile exception and the open fields doctrine to reason that the hidden beeper in that case revealed nothing more to the police that what they constitutionally could have obtained through permissible visual surveillance.)

United States v. Williams, 650 F. Supp. 2d 633 (W.D. Ky. 2009)

Cited by 33 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Cassity604 F. Supp. 1566 (E.D. Mich. 1985)
Doe ex rel. Doe v. Alabama State Department of Education915 F.2d 651 (11th Cir. 1990)
State v. Novembrino519 A.2d 820 (N.J. 1987)
United States v. Alicia Davis (85-1153), Duane Davis (85-1178), Kenneth Davis (85-1288), Howard Ransom (85-1366)809 F.2d 1194 (6th Cir. 1987)
United States v. Alejandrina Torres751 F.2d 875 (7th Cir. 1985)
United States v. Antonio Badalamenti, Andrea Gambino, Ferdinando Capasso794 F.2d 821 (2d Cir. 1986)

Most recent

United States v. Fisher745 F.3d 200 (6th Cir. 2014)
United States v. Williams650 F. Supp. 2d 633 (W.D. Ky. 2009)
Chavez ex rel. Chavez v. Board of Education614 F. Supp. 2d 1184 (D.N.M. 2009)
United States v. Gomez276 F.3d 694 (5th Cir. 2001)
United States v. Kenneth King227 F.3d 732 (6th Cir. 2000)
Singer v. AT & T Corp.185 F.R.D. 681 (S.D. Fla. 1998)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list