Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority and Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
Garcia v. San Antonio Metro. Transit Auth., 468 U.S. 1227 (1984)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
D. C. W. D. Tex. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 464 U. S. 812 .] Motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument granted.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“[C]onsiderable weight should be accorded to an executive department’s construction of a statutory scheme it is entrusted to administer....”)
-
(“If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end of the matter; for the court, as well as the agency, must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress.”)
-
(“The court need not conclude that the agency construction was the only one it permissibly could have adopted to uphold the construction, or even the reading the court would have reached if the question initially had arisen in a judicial proceeding.”)
Cited by 100 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals26
- Federal District Courts35
- Bankruptcy Courts2
- Federal Specialty Courts25
- State Highest Courts4
- State Appellate Courts8
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.