Macon Ass'n for Retarded Citizens v. Macon-Bibb County Planning & Zoning Commission

Macon Association for Retarded Citizens v. Macon-Bibb County Planning and Zoning Commission

Macon Ass'n for Retarded Citizens v. Macon-Bibb Cnty. Planning & Zoning Comm'n, 469 U.S. 802 (1984)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 1, 1984
Docket: No. 84-156
Citations: 469 U.S. 802105 S. Ct. 5783 L. Ed. 2d 853 U.S.L.W. 32341984 U.S. LEXIS 2942

Cited by 28 3 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ga. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(holding that "if the restriction of the individual occurs as an incident of the regulation of a present situation, it is not an ex post facto law")

Hampton v. Dept. of Corr., 765 A.2d 286 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2001)
(doctrine of collateral estoppel not mandated by constitution or statute)

Velasquez v. Franz, 589 A.2d 143 (N.J. 1991)

Cited by 28 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

State ex rel. L.R.890 A.2d 343 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2006)
Velasquez v. Franz589 A.2d 143 (N.J. 1991)
State ex rel. Lr890 A.2d 343 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2006)
State v. Grunow506 A.2d 708 (N.J. 1986)
New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. R.D.23 A.3d 352 (N.J. 2011)
In re Thoma873 S.W.2d 477 (Tex. 1994)

Most recent

Rocky Hill v. SecureCare Realty, LLCNo. SC19275 (Conn. Jan. 6, 2015)
New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. R.D.23 A.3d 352 (N.J. 2011)
Dyfs v. Rd991 A.2d 233 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2010)
Division of Youth & Family Services v. R.D.991 A.2d 233 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2010)
State ex rel. Lr890 A.2d 343 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2006)
State ex rel. L.R.890 A.2d 343 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2006)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list